RETIRED RCMP INSPECTOR WILLIAM MAJCHER SWEARS AFFIDAVIT ABOUT CORRUPT CANADIAN LAWYERS AND JUDGES (Published by Mr.Best)

Affidavit reveals deep-rooted corruption of lawyers and judges in British Columbia, Manitoba and Ontario

In 2002, it was revealed that William Majcher was a deep-cover RCMP police officer working against the dangerous Medellin Drug Cartel by targeting money-laundering operations in Canada.

“The Medellin Cartel, naturally, put out a contract to murder RCMP undercover officer William Majcher.”

For three years Majcher had worked undercover as a Futures and Options Commodity Trader primarily based on the floor of the Winnipeg Commodity Exchange. He took down disgraced Ontario lawyer Simon Rosenfeld and others for drug cartel money laundering, including Mark Valentine of the now-defunct Toronto-based brokerage firm Thomson Kernaghan & Co. Ltd..

Then in 2005, the RCMP removed Inspector Majcher from command of the Vancouver-based Integrated Market Enforcement Teams (IMET) – apparently because he sought nomination as a future candidate for the Conservative party. And because – much worse – in the news media Majcher alleged that the Crown prosecutors would not proceed with criminal charges against several high-profile individuals, and he hoped he could be more effective in politics than he had been in policing.

In other words – in 2005, RCMP Inspector William Majcher alleged corruption in the legal system and the system turned on him like a pack of wolves. What a surprise!

Flash forward to July 19, 2017 and William Majcher swore an affidavit in the Supreme Court of Canada civil case: Angleland Holdings Inc., Nederland Holdings Inc., John English, Paradise Beach Resorts Inc. and Pacific Rim resort vs Gergory N. Harney Law Corporation et al.

Every Canadian should read William Majcher’s affidavit and carefully consider the implications of what happens when the legal profession and justice system are allowed to police themselves with zero independent oversight and zero external accountability.

“During the course of my employment with the RCMP while working undercover or in handling criminal informants, I became tasked with knowlege and evidence of payoffs, bribery and case fixing that included judges, lawyers and court registry staff in various parts of Canada.”

If you read nothing else today, download and read William Majcher’s affidavit (720kb pdf)

Then read the case of the John English family – that Majcher swore his affidavit in support of.

Our justice system is self-destructing before our eyes because too many lawyers, judges and elected / appointed government officials place their profession, friends, cartels and profits before the rule of law.

Notice to readers, including Persons and Entities mentoned in articles

As always, if anyone disagrees with anything published at DonaldBest.CA or wishes to provide a public response or comment, please contact me at info@donaldbest.ca and I will publish your writing with equal prominence. Comments left on articles are moderated about once a day. Or, of course, you can sue me and serve my lawyer Paul Slansky. You can find Mr. Slansky’s information here.

Photos have been included to put context to the article. Their use is the same as with other Canadian news outlets.

Readers are also encouraged to thoroughly study all the evidence available here at DonaldBest.CA, to perform independent research on the Internet and elsewhere, to consider all sides and to make up their own minds as to the events reported on DonaldBest.CA.

Donald Best
Barrie, Ontario, Canada

 

18 thoughts on “RETIRED RCMP INSPECTOR WILLIAM MAJCHER SWEARS AFFIDAVIT ABOUT CORRUPT CANADIAN LAWYERS AND JUDGES (Published by Mr.Best)”

  1. Dear Mansur,

    I am sharing this information and the Petition filed in the United Nations General Assembly with you as the Supreme Court of Canada and court of Appeal of British Columbia have lost Jurisdiction on the subject matter in a case indexed as Hirji v. Owners Strata Corporation Plan VR-44 and have committed the following offences:

    The indisputable evidence submitted at the trial and in this petition confirms that the Hirjis’ proved their burden of proof and their prima facie case.

    The evidence confirms the defendants failed to negate the Hirjis’
    prima facie case at the trial in a case Indexed at Hirji v. The Owners Strata Corporation Plan VR-44 2015 BCSC 2043.The Court records confirms Madam Justice Sharma (“the trial judge”) systematically suppressed all material facts and evidence submitted by the
    Hirjis’ at the trial and fabricated and made-up the facts in almost entire
    Reasons for Judgment either on trial judge’s own accord, or on the
    instructions of the higher official(s) of the “Administration of Justice” to
    unlawfully dismiss the Hirjis’ case to protect the interest of the defendants and their insurers.

    The indisputable evidence confirms that the judges of Court of appeal
    of British Columbia Madam justice Newbury, Mr. justice Ian T. Donald,
    Madam justice Mary E. Saunders, and madam justice Elizabeth A. Bennett and the Supreme Court of Canada judges Honourable Beverley McLachlin, P.C.Chief Justice of Canada, Honourable Justice Russell Brown, Honourable Justice Clément Gascon, Honourable Justice Suzanne Côté, Honourable Justice Malcolm Rowe, Honourable Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, Honourable justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Honourable Justice Michael J. Moldaver, Honourable Justice Richard Wagner, approved the void orders of the trial judge and failed to carry out their judicial duties and failed to uphold the rule of the law of the land.

    The judicial officers violated the provisions of the Constitution and aided
    and abetted the unlawful acts of the trial judge and approved the
    enforcement of the void orders of the trial judge that would unlawfully
    strip down the Hirjis of their lives assets and make them homeless.
    Click on this link to read the full Petition with Indisputable evidence
    submitted to the United Nations General Assembly and the Human Rights

    Council. https://www.mohdhirji.com also see the petition at https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/535/960/828/.

    Regards,

    Mohd

  2. From: Mohd Ali Hirji [mailto:moh2@shaw.ca]
    Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 9:02 AM
    To: PMB-AED@parl.gc.ca
    Cc: petitions@ohchr.org
    Subject: FW: Delivery of Petition Signatures to All Honourable Members of Parliament of Canada and the Petitions Team of Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
    Importance: High

    Mohd Ali Hirji and Parin Mohd Ali Hiji Lalani
    1084 Lillooet Road,
    North Vancouver,
    British Columbia V7j 2H8.
    Canada.
    Email: moh2@shaw.ca
    Email: parin.lalani@hotmail.com
    Website: http://www.mohdhirji.com
    TEL: (604) 985-9383

    All Honourable Members of Parliament of Canada.
    House of Commons
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Canada
    K1A 0A6
    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Petitions Team
    Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
    United Nations Office at Geneva
    1211 Geneva 10 (Switzerland)

    Dear Honourable Members of the Government of Canada and the United Nations Petitions Team,

    September 18, 2018.

    REF: Petition to OHCHR https://www.mohdhirji.com/
    REF: https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/535/960/828/

    DELIVERY OF HIRJIS’ PETITION SIGNATURES TO THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENT AND THE UNITED NATIONS PETITION TEAM.

    We, the undersigned residents of Global community belonging to the Human Family, call upon the Government of Canada to take notice of this Petition and the attached list of signatories and take appropriate action under the Canadian Constitution and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and remedy this Miscarriage of Justice unlawfully and fraudulently imposed on Hirji by the trusted Judicial officers of the Canadian courts. We request the Canadian parliament to also take notice of University of Toronto Faculty of Law and submission to UN by Human Rights Groups that Says “Treatment of Children … Mohd Ali Hirji Constitutional and Human rights of Canadian Citizens are violated”.

    We urge the Canadian Government to take immediate and appropriate action to suspend or remove the named judicial officers in the petition from the trusted judicial office who have willfully violated their oath of office and have lost the public trust and respect. Canadian Government has a legal obligation to protect its Citizens from willful violations of their guaranteed Constitutional Rights by the trusted officers of the court appointed by the Government. These acts are willfully and concisely committed by the trusted officers of the court that makes the crimes even more repulsive.

    The Government of Canada must consider the seriousness of unlawful acts committed by the judicial officers of the state and must act now to prevent and protect the Canadian Citizens from unlawful Miscarriage of Justice. Members of Parliament must consider will any legal counsel who has a legal obligation to look after the best interest of their clients in all honesty advice or expose their clients to appear before these judges after knowing these facts of willful violations and abuse of the judicial office to unlawfully deny justice to the litigant?

    Signatures: Mohd Ali Hirji
    Signatures: Parin Mohd Ali Hirji
    Signatures: See attached Petition signatures of over 1800 members of Human Family.

    We look forward to a just resolution by the Human Rights Committee members and the member state in timely manner of willfully committed violations of Fundamental Human Rights by the member state that are enshrined in in the Canadian Constitution and ICCPR covenants.
    Yours Sincerely,
    Mr and Mrs Mohd Ali Hirji.
    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
    ON JULY 5, 2018 FOLLOWING FACTS WERE POSTED ON UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACEBOOK TIMELINE FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF LAW PROFESSORS. SEE BELOW THEIR RESPONSE POSTED ON GOOGAL.CA
    Mohd Ali Hirji Constitutional and Human rights of Canadian Citizens are violated every day by the criminal acts of all level of Canadian Court judges. The University law professors can teach the law to their students but how can the law professional get justice for their clients when the court judges belong to the criminal network of judges operating in Canadian courts? The plaintiff proves their case in the court the trial judge willfully Fabricates omits and misstates the facts in reasons for judgment and denies the justice to the old age pensioners and orders to pay costs of over $900,000 to the defendants and make the pensioners homeless. The Court of Appeal approves the criminal acts of a trial judge. All nine supreme court judges made the criminal acts of lower court judges into law.
    Can this kind of injustices be accepted and approved by the University law professors and is it acceptable in a civil society like Canada. See the links below that rocked the faith and trust of Canadians in the Canadian judicial system.

    https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/535/960/828/
    https://www.waterwarcrimes.com/newest-developments-blog
    _________________________________________________
    POST ON GOOLAL.CA
    __________________________________________
    International Human Rights Program, University of Toronto Faculty …
    Searches related to International Human Rights Program, University of Toronto Faculty of … https://www.facebook.com/International-Human-Rights-P…/posts Rating: 5 – ‎1 vote Joint Submission to UN by Human Rights Groups Says Treatment of Children … Mohd Ali Hirji Constitutional and Human rights of Canadian Citizens are violated.

  3. Not to mention the Dept. Of Justice forces their lawyers to break the law. A lawyer Edward Schmidt took the government of Canada to court as he stated he was being forced in his job to break laws and go against the Charter of Rights.. Put that together with Bill Majchers affidavit and you have a serious problem in Canada highlighted by this Petition here.

  4. Sorry its Edgar Schmidt. Very interesting lawsuit with the Attorney General arguing against Schmidt and his counsel. They are miles apart but based on how the Attorney General was involved in the Donald Best case at the Federal Court I wouldn’t put much faith in the competency of the Attorney General. Let’s put away all the legal shenanigans and call it in plain simple language. Any laws that infringe on charter of Rights have no place before Parliament to pass. Fix the laws first and stop trying to circumvent the rule of law hiding behind this Statute or that Statute. Edgar Schmidt is right. His lawsuit is constitutional.

    You Mr. Hirji are courageous. Your petition is bang on the truth. They know its the truth and they cover it up. They know Edgar Schmidt is right but that they need to rip off Canadians and step on citizens rights.

    I cant read your petition or the water crimes site. I get the warning to avoid it. Why’s that.. I know why.

  5. Dear Mr. Best, Please can you contact me when you can. Thanks a lot.

    According to the global criminal justice watchdog, 40% of Human rights violations found around the world occurs due to unfair trials.

    These crimes against Humanity and the members of Human rights families are willfully committed by some of the most senior officers appointed by the Member States around the globe who have signed the ICCPR covenants and have ratified the treaties to uphold Human Rights and protect the fundamental rights of the members of the Human families that make up over 40% Human Rights violations by Global courts by denying litigants their fundamental right to a Fair Trial and equal benefit of the law and depriving them of justice.

    It is a well-known fact that lawyers are afraid to expose the members of the judiciary for their unlawful and criminal acts because of fear of reprisals from the court. No legal counsel would agree to represent the Hirjis or even provide them with legal advice or even help them draft a petition because it exposes the unlawful and flagrant acts of members states judiciary and because of the reprisals by the states court against the legal counsels or the law enforcement officers who expose the criminal activities of the Canadian Judiciary or the Ministry of Justice or the Government officials.

    Fundamental and natural justice and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world, and if these right are denied by the member state and the United Nations rejects the admissibility of victims case solely on the basis that the victim’s complaint is not in compliance with the United Nations committee rules particularly when the member states openly acts unlawfully and commits reprisal against the legal counsels and the law enforcement officers who try to uphold the rule of law and obtain justice for their clients and exposes the unlawful and criminal acts of the member state then it defeats the object of the establishment of the United Nations Human rights organization.

    United Nations Human rights organization under these conditions needs to give a very serious consideration to willfully committed crimes and violations of Human Rights by some of the most civilized member state of the United Nations such as Canada by willfully creating unlawful laws to deny justice and destroy the lives of the members of the Human families the court elects to destroy.

    United Nations Human rights organization should seriously consider why should any unethical and corrupt member of the judiciary would willingly elect to act lawfully and protect the violations of Human Rights when they know that they have absolute power and are unaccountable to anyone for their unlawful acts and horrendous crimes willfully committed against humanity and mankind and deprive them of justice and unlawfully impose Miscarriage of justice on them and stripe them down of their lives assets and savings and make them homeless with the full knowledge that very few if any legal counsels will dare to expose the trial courts unlawful acts or will represent the victims of Human Rights violations before the Human Rights committee.

    The victims very rarely will have the expertise or knowledge to submit a communication that complies with all the requirements of admissibility under ICCPR and the member state by arguing the inadmissibility of the communications regardless of its merit, or substance, or gravity of violation of victims’ rights before the United Nations Human Rights Committee succeeds in almost every case on the grounds of inadmissibility and succeeds in creating case laws based on fabricated reasons for judgement by trial courts that are then relied upon and applied by the domestic courts and legal counsels as well as Global legal community to deny justice to countless victims throughout the Globe and persecutes them by applying unlawfully created case laws and unlawfully imposing Miscarriage of justices on them.

    I invite Amnesty International on December 10th to join me in our fight against injustices on Human race on Human Rights Day and request the United Nations Human Rights Committee to take action and hold the perpetrators named in our petition for willfully violating our fundamental Human rights accountable.

    I believe the just outcome of this case in the United Nation will discourage the radicals to take the law into their own hands that can result in the loss of a great number of innocent lives and will bring down violations of Human rights currently running at a staggering 40% that is totally unacceptable in a civil society.

    See the Petition filed in the United Nations for the consideration of the Human Rights Committee on June 30, 2018, against the member state’s judicial officers who willfully and deliberately committed fraud upon us and upon the state and deprived the Canadian taxpayers of some 400 million dollars in tax revenue. see the full details on our website at https://www.mohdhirji.com/.

  6. Please help and Sign and Support this petition to United Nation.

    “Hirjis’ revolts against the Lawless and fraudulent orders of Supreme Court of Canada to make them homeless and challenges the Integrity of Canadian Courts’ in the United Nations”..

    The Aga Khan’s public discourse.

    “A passion for justice, quest for equality, respect for tolerance-a dedication to human dignity-these are universal human values which are broadly shared across the division of classes, race, language, faith, and geography. They constitute what classical philosophers-in the east and west alike-have described as human ‘vertue’-not merely the absence of negative restrains on individual freedom, but also a set of positive responsibilities, moral disciplines, which prevent liberty from turning into license.” — His Highness the Aga Khan, Columbia University, 2006.

    Mohd Ali Hirji a 74-year-old Canadian Citizen a pensioner and the follower of His Highness the Aga Khan has challenged the integrity of the Supreme Court of Canada- the Highest Court of Canada, and the integrity of Canadian courts in the United Nations Human Rights Commission in Geneva Switzerland. Hirjis publicly condemns and opposes the lawless acts unlawfully and willfully committed by the Canadian Courts against them.

    The Hirjis have refused to comply with void court orders passed by trial judge Madam Justice Sharma which were based on “falsified findings of facts” in the Reasons for Judgement rendered on November 6, 2015. Madam Justice Sharma committed one of the most serious criminal acts in violation of Criminal Code s. 139 “any judge would willfully commit and jeopardized his/her secured carrier by “Falsifying the Facts” in Reasons for Judgement by taking advantage and abusing the trusted judicial office that is punishable in law by removal of the judge from the office and possible jail sentence of up to 10 years”. These lawless acts, atrocities, cruelty, and injustices committed by the trial judge on the Hirjis were willfully upheld and aided by the Court of Appeal Judges Madam justice Newbury, Mr. justice Ian T. Donald, Madam Justice Mary E. Saunders, and madam justice Elizabeth A. Bennett.

    Furthermore, these criminal acts committed by the lower court judges are willfully supported and approved by the Supreme Court of Canada judges Honourable Beverley McLachlin, P.C.Chief Justice of Canada, Honourable Justice Russell Brown, Honourable Justice Clément Gascon, Honourable Justice Suzanne Côté, Honourable Justice Malcolm Rowe, Honourable Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, Honourable justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Honourable Justice Michael J. Moldaver, Honourable Justice Richard Wagner. The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the invalid, void and unenforceable court orders in law to willfully deny justice to the Hirjis and make them homeless unlawfully abusing their judicial offices for the purpose other than the public good.

    These are extremely serious and explosive charges against the fourteen Canadian judicial officers supported by facts, pieces of evidence and court records as presented by Hirji in his case. However; none of the judicial officers named in the petition defended or repudiated these charges.

    On April 7, 2015, Hirjis appeared before the Supreme Court of British Columbia in a 25 days trial in front of trial judge Madam Justice Sharma. Hirji proved their burden of proof and their case with cogent evidence at the trial. However; Madam Justice Sharma willfully “falsified the facts” in reasons for her Judgment on November 6, 2015, and committed one of the most serious criminal act in violation of criminal code s. 139 that any judge would willingly commit. Such an offense is punishable in law by removal of the judge from the office and possible jail sentence of up to 10 years. The Hirjis repeatedly brought the falsified facts to the attention of the trial judge Madam Justice Sharma before the order was sealed and requested Madam Justice Sharma to correct the “Falsified facts” that results in “Miscarriage of Justice”. Madam Justice Sharma unlawfully refused/ ignored to correct the “Falsified Facts” with the full knowledge of the consequences of “falsified facts” and willfully denied justice to the Hirjis. The court issued orders that amount to over $900,000 in favor of the defendants based on the “falsified facts” that would unlawfully strip down the Hirjis of their lives savings and their home. It allowed the defendants and their insurers to put the charge on Hirjis home that would make them homeless.

    On November 25, 2016, Hirjis submitted the facts and evidence before a penal of three judges of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia namely justice Ian T. Donald, Madam Justice Mary E. Saunders, and madam justice Elizabeth A. The penal of judges willfully ignored the pieces of evidence placed before them that unquestionably establishes the fraud committed by the trial judge. Furthermore, the penal of judges of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia willfully aided and abated the lawless acts of the trial judge and upheld the lawless acts of the trial judge made into law.

    On November 25, 2016, Hirji submitted the following evidence to the penal of judges of the challenge issued to the defendants in his affidavit filed on October 24, 2016, to produce the evidence at the hearing at paragraph 44 it reads as follows: “This is one of the key issues in this litigation. Here is my challenge to the defendants. If the defendants can submit to this honorable court and produce any strata minutes entered into evidence in the trial that would indicate to this honorable court that strata responded diligently to all of the plaintiffs complaints and took reasonable actions to remediate the problem then the plaintiff gives this undertaking to this honourable court in this sworn affidavit that plaintiff will not only concede but he will also hand over the keys to his unit to the defendants.(unit valued at over $600,000). There cannot be any more “cogent evidence” than this to convince the court what the facts were in the trial and who has the questionable credibility issue is it the plaintiff or is it the learned trial judge and the defense counsel who misled the court.”

    The defense counsel was fully aware of falsified facts by the trial judge in almost entire reasons for Judgment. The defense counsel could neither produce a single evidence to penal of judges at the hearing that would indicate to the penal of judges that the Hirjis claims of violations of their Charter Rights and “Falsified Facts” by the trial judge in Hirjis affidavit are false, nor could the defense counsel produce any evidence that would negate or repudiate the Hirjis claims of falsified facts by the trial judge on November 6, 2015, in Reasons for Judgement.

    The evidence clearly established the fact that the penal of the court of appeal willfully violated Hirjis Charter Rights and again committed “fraud upon the court and fraud upon the Hirjis” by upholding invalid void and unenforceable court orders in law of the trial judge Madam Justice Sharma.

    Lawless acts of the court of appeal, violations of Hirjis Charter rights and falsified facts by the trial judge were repeatedly brought to the attention of all nine judges of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada had Constitutional obligations as well as judicial duty to quash invalid orders based on void orders passed by lower courts and court of appeal.

    However, all nine judges, of Supreme Court of Canada willfully aided and abated the lawless and fraudulent acts of lower court judges and maintained the void and unenforceable orders of the lower courts by upholding the unlawful orders of the lower courts.

    On April 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada approved the lawless acts of the lower court judges and willfully dismissed the Hirjis application for leave to appeal. Thus, Supreme Court of Canada willfully denied justice to Hirjis and awarded costs against them by unlawfully abusing their judicial office contrary to the pledge to uphold the rule of law under the Supreme law of the land; “Constitution of Canada”.

    On December 4, 2017, after the Hirjis put all nine Judges of Supreme Court of Canada on notice for their lawless acts and failures to act lawfully, to carry out their judicial duties and willfully violating the Canadian Constitution and oath of office. The Supreme Court of Canada reverted in an email on the same date, specifically denying any further remedies to Hirjis stating that Supreme Court of Canada no longer has the jurisdiction on the case and has no further remedies for Hirjis. Thus, the Supreme Court of Canada has left Hirjis without the remedies and illegally placed the charge on their property.

    The Government of Canada has turned a blind eye to this issue of national Importance and allows these corrupt judges to sit on the bench and allows the Canadian Court judges to continue to abuse their judicial office and to continue to commit lawless acts, atrocities, cruelty, and injustices with dictatorial powers against its citizens who appear before these judges with their legal counsels in good faith in pursuit of truth and justice.

    The following message and response were received after some seven months from the Minister of Justice of Canada that is self-explanatory: Your message To: Wilson-Raybould, Jody – M.P. Subject: FW: FRAUD COMMITTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2018 4:41:08 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) was deleted without being read on Thursday, January 24, 2019 7:42:50 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

    Hirjis having exhausted all domestic remedies have submitted and filed their petition to the United Nations Human Rights Committee on June 30, 2018, that provides comprehensive details and evidence of Wilfull violations of Hirjis Human rights and the fraudulent acts of the Canadian Court Judges named in the petition to unlawfully deny justice and make Hirjis homeless on Hirjis website https://www.mohdhirji.com/

    On November 25, 2018, The Hirjis Re-Submitted their petition to the United Nations Human Rights Committee in compliance with the admissibility requirement in Article 5(2) (b) of the first Optional Protocol to the ICCPR.

    As Canadian Citizen can any member or any leader of any community feel secure and be proud of being a Canadian Citizen in face of outrages acts of the Canadian Courts to willfully commit lawless acts, atrocities, cruelty, and injustices on its citizens and unlawfully issuing court orders to rob one of its law-abiding citizens, a pensioner, of their lives savings, their home and make them homeless by unlawfully abusing their Judicial privileges? Can any respectable legal professionals who believe in justice and fails to condemn and oppose the injustices willfully committed by Canadian court judges be proud of their legal profession? Can the current members of Government of Canada be proud of their office by the outrageous acts of the highest court in the land and ignoring the issue of National Importance by simply turning a blind eye and ignoring the complaints of violations of its citizens guaranteed Rights under the Constitution and Charter rights and violations of Human Rights and allows the handful of Canadian Court judges to continue to commit lawless acts, atrocities, cruelty, and injustices against its citizens that cannot be justified in any competent court of law in the world?

    According to the global criminal justice watchdog, 40% https://www.fairtrials.org/right-fair-trial of Human rights violations found around the world occur due to unfair trials as clearly demonstrated by Hirjis case. These crimes against Humanity and the member of Human families are willfully committed by some of the most trusted senior officers of the Court appointed by the Member States of the United Nations who have signed the ICCPR covenants and have ratified the treaties to uphold Human Rights and to protect the fundamental rights of the members of the Human families.

    Hirjis Appeals and urges to all the Scholars of the legal institutions, and the leaders of NGO, as well as the Leaders of all religious Institutions, and the Leaders and campaigners of justices and any other organization that believes that “injustices imposed on any member of Human family is injustice imposed on everyone and Injustice is the root cause of poverty, violence and unrest in the world” to take firm action and publicly condemn and oppose the injustices and submit their own submissions to United Nations as submitted by International Human Rights Program, University of Toronto Faculty Rating: 5 – ‎1 vote Joint Submission to UN by Human Rights Groups Says Treatment of Children … Mohd Ali Hirji Constitutional and Human rights of Canadian Citizens are violated.

    Please do the right thing for your children and grandchildren and save this wonderful country of ours by condemning and opposing this kind of injustices imposed on any member of Human Family in Canada or anywhere in the world In the United Nations. Please register your disapproval against injustices and submit your own submissions to the United Nations, by signing this petition to the United Nation to protect your as well as your children and grandchildren rights.

  7. “Obstruction of justice” Willfully committed by the officials of the Highest court of Canada by the very same officers of the Supreme Court of Canada appointed by the Federal Government of Canada to protect the rights of its citizens and the Constitution and the “Rule of the Law” of the land. Can the Canadian Citizens have faith in the Judicial System and Rule of Law when the Highest officials of the Court of the land willfully violates the oath of office and the constitution and the government allows those officials to sit on the bench to decide the fate of life and death of Canadian citizens who appear before these officials in good faith in pursuit truth and justice? for full details see https://www.thepetitionsite.com/…/public-disclosure-by-the…/ and letter sent to all nine judicial officers of the Supreme Court of Canada requesting them to uphold the Constitution and the “Rule of Law” https://drive.google.com/open… … and https://drive.google.com/open…

  8. CAN THE CANADIANS OR THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY HAVE CONFIDENCE IN JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF CANADA? 74 YEAR OLD PENSIONERS THE HIRJIS CHALLENGES THE INTEGRITY OF THE CANADIAN COURTS, INCLUDING ALL NINE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, IN THE UNITED NATIONS, FOR PERSECUTIONS OF HIRJIS FOR THE CRIMES THE HIRJIS DID NOT COMMIT, BUT ARE WILLFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY COMMITTED BY LAWLESS ACTS OF ALL NINE JUDICIAL OFFICERS OF THE COURT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA NAMELY HONOURABLE BEVERLEY MCLACHLIN, P.C.CHIEF JUSTICE OF CANADA, HONOURABLE JUSTICE RUSSELL BROWN, HONOURABLE JUSTICE CLÉMENT GASCON, HONOURABLE JUSTICE SUZANNE CÔTÉ, HONOURABLE JUSTICE MALCOLM ROWE, HONOURABLE JUSTICE ANDROMACHE KARAKATSANIS, HONOURABLE JUSTICE ROSALIE SILBERMAN ABELLA, HONOURABLE JUSTICE MICHAEL J. MOLDAVER, HONOURABLE JUSTICE RICHARD WAGNER. THAT CAN NOT BE JUSTIFIED UNDER THE LAW OR THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION. THE HONOURABLE DAVID LAMETTI MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA AS WELL AS ALL THE MEMBERS ARE FULLY AWARE OF LAWLESS ACTS OF THE THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA OFFICIALS AND UNLAWFUL PERSECUTIONS OF HIRJIS THAT IS NO LESS EVIL THEN THE PERSECUTIONS COMMITTED BY THE JUDICIAL OFFICERS IN WORLD WAR II AGAINST THE INNOCENT VICTIMS WHERE THEY WERE ROBBED OF THEIR WEALTH AND PROPERTIES AND MADE HOMELESS BY ABUSING THE JUDICIAL OFFICE. AFTER 70 YEARS OF ESTABLISHMENT OF THE UNITED NATIONS THESE CRIMES ARE OPENLY COMMITTED BY THE JUDICIAL OFFICERS OF CANADA ONE OF THE MOST CIVILIZED COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD. FOR FULL DETAIL GOOGLE HIRJIS PETITIONS TO UNITED NATIONS OR GO TO MOHDALIHIRJI.COM.

  9. OPEN LETTER TO ALL ELECTED MEMBERS OF CURRENT PARLIAMENT AND THE MEMBERS OF PUBLIC.

    The Hirjis are forced to take this unusual step and protest in front of the Supreme Court and Appeal Court of British Columbia to seek the public support to bring fourteen judicial officers of the court to justice for “Obstructing the Course Justice” including nine judicial officers of the Supreme Court of Canada from 2015 till today. Hirjis will be protesting before the Supreme Court of B.C until this matter is addressed by the Honourable Members of the parliament.

    The Judicial officers of the Supreme Court of Canada willfully and Knowing refused to act lawfully and uphold the “Rule of Law” because it would have set a new Canadian precedent by the Hirjis in Hirji v. The Owners Strata Corporation Plan VR-44 2015 BCSC 2043 as a self-representing litigant to hold accountable the trial judge Justice Sharma of Supreme Court of British Columbia. The trial Judge’s unlawful acts aided and abated by Court of appeal judges of British Columbia. The fraud and Criminal acts willfully and unlawfully committed by the lower court Judges to unlawfully deny justice to the Hirjis and this “Obstruction of Justice” in violations of Criminal Code s.139(2) is knowingly and willfully approved by all nine Judges of the Supreme Court of Canada.

    These unlawful persecutions of the Hirjis by the judicial officers of the Highest Court of Canada are unconscionable, because these crimes are knowingly, willingly, and unlawfully committed by the most trusted judicial officers of the highest court of Canada that is no less evil than the crimes committed by the judicial officers who willfully persecuted the innocent victims of the Second World War and willfully and unlawfully robbed the innocent victims of their lives assets, possessions and their home amongst other things.

    To this day none of the judicial officers named in the petition for persecutions of Hirjis by the judicial officers of the Highest Court of Canada have either defended or repudiated these claims by the Hirjis simply because based on the evidence none of the judicial officers can deny or defend these explosive claims and justify the abuse of judicial Independence under the law. See the evidence sent to all nine judges of Supreme Court of Canada putting all of them on notice for their unlawful acts. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1o7VZP1VIGhOGY2DwWnoZgJyCpHlIfZwS

    It is astonishing to see that these violations are knowingly, willfully and unlawfully and openly committed by the most trusted judicial officers of the highest court of Canada without any justification or fear of any reprisals under the umbrella of Judicial Independence.

    The Judicial Independent was never granted to the courts to be abused by the judicial officers of the court either by the Parliament or the Legislatures or by the General Public nor have they permitted the judicial officers to place themselves above the “Rule of Law” and destroy the lives of the litigants who appear before the judicial officers in good faith in pursuit of truth and justice.

    When any government officials appointed in good faith to the public office who willfully acts in violations of the Constitution, then they have forfeited their right to hold that office. The Government of Canada and the elected Members of the parliament regardless of their political affiliation to different parties has legal obligations to protect the best interest of the electorates and the Constitution and must take necessary steps to remove these violators of oath office and the constitution from the office to protect the Rule of Law and wellbeing of the public. For the Government to allow these officials to remain in the office and allow them to continue to violate their oath of office and the pledge to uphold the constitution and destroy the lives of litigants would be totally unconstitutional and detrimental to the credibility and integrity of “Rule of Law” and justice and public safety and will inevitably lead to divisions in different communities and civil unrest.

    Minister of Justice Ms. Jody Wilson-Raybould the chief officer of the law of Canada failed to address the willful “Obstruction of Justice” and Miscarriage of Justice unlawfully imposed on the Hirjis by the judicial officers of the courts sent by the Prime minister’s office and the Hirjis in various emails to the Minister of Justice Ms. Jody Wilson-Raybould.

    The Minister sat on this issue of willful “Obstruction of Justice” to strip down the Hirjis of their lives assets and their home and make them homeless for the crimes Hirjis did not commit for next seven months.

    On January 24, 2019 Minister confirmed to the Hirjis in four different emails that Your message To: Wilson-Raybould, Jody – M.P. Subject: FW: FRAUD COMMITTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2018 @ PM (UTC-@) Pacific Time (US & Canada) WAS DELETED WITHOUT BEING READ on Thursday, January 24, 2019 @ PM (UTC-@) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

    The Affidavit of senior RCMP INSPECTOR William-Robert-Majcher exposes the extent of judicial corruption and the criminal network of judges operating in Canada. In paragraph 6. The INSPECTOR states; “In several instances, my co-workers and I reported our concerns about corruption in the administration of justice to senior members of the RCMP and DOJ, who refused to investigate or bring charges against any of the lawyers, judges or court registry staff involved in the corruption”. Click on the following link to read the entire affidavit of INSPECTOR William-Robert-Majcher. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1hwgmetSgB7U0TURf7KQBv9TlIfd5uYvx

  10. Canadian civil society or any Civil society can only survive when the fundamental rights of the citizens and the “Rule of Law” and the justice system are upheld and maintained by the state’s legal institutions without discriminations. When these rights are violated and taken away from them by the most trusted judicial officers of the state’s court and the citizens are unlawfully stripped down of their assets and their home for the crimes the citizen did not commit by fraudulent means by the State’s courts then the Civil society can not survive. It is the duty and the responsibility of every legal Institution and every professor of Faculty of Law and every citizen of Global community and the leaders of every Global community to oppose these atrocities committed by the judicial officers of the states on their citizens that is no less evil than the crimes committed by the judicial officers against the victims of second world war that led to the establishment of the United Nations. After 70 years of establishment of the United Nations, these Atrocities are still willfully committed by the state courts without any effective reprisals by the United Nations for years. see https://www.mohdhirji.com/ also see https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WtMUmZtwZ9bTziNpqm_4Ziz6z6N8xA0b and
    https://drive.google.com/open?id=1o7VZP1VIGhOGY2DwWnoZgJyCpHlIfZwS

    1. Journalist with questions Thank you. please go to this message on https://www.facebook.com/100021940598176/videos/2350004951916150/

      Thank you All Facebook friends for your unwavering support in my fight against the injustices. I am pleased to Inform all the friends that with your kind help and advice and with the kind help of various University’s Faculty of the law allowing me to bring this issue of willful “obstruction of Justice” on their Facebook by the very same officers of the court appointed by the federal government of Canada to protect the rights of the Canadian citizens.

      I was able to file a lawsuit on May 6, 2019 case no. S=195306 that has put the integrity of Canadian justice system and the integrity of judicial officers on trial and the Department of Justice who will be dealing with this case before the court and their ability to honor their pledge and an oath of office to protect the Canadian Constitution and uphold the rule of law impartially and bring the perpetrators to justice in this case.

      This case will set a new president in Canadian courts either way and whether the Government of Canada will allow those judges to willfully fabricate the evidence in the reasons for judgment and deny justice to the litigants by openly committing criminal acts against its citizens and make them homeless or will the Government remove those judges from the office and protect the citizens from miscarriage of justice? As requested by some of you I will post the progress of this litigation and the outcome of this case and every chambers hearing and the final outcome of this case on my website:Mohdalihirji.com to keep all of you up-to-date who have been following this case. see the Notice of Civil Claim filed in the court registry. https://drive.google.com/open

  11. Sorry typo Mohd. You hit the nail on the head. So does Arif. We wonder when the OPP will arrest these fraudulent insurance people. Perhaps the rcmp and csis can provide the raping bugs like apps on phones that can count your steps and monitor your breathing or heart rate and use that to detect the pain in your body. Oh right.That’s illegal and a human rights violation . So saying someone is too pretty to be injured or they smile so they can’t be in pain of have anxiety is so fraudulent and illegal just like modern technology can be as well if used improperly.

    The tech companies supplying these types of bugs are not too happy with this revelation but who cares. We out it anyways and we know crooked people use this technology linked to crooked government and since government does nothing to protect citizens from this and allows fraudulent insurance agents and lawyers to get away with it as well we out it all.

  12. His Excellency the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet’s.

    After the establishment of the United Nations in 1948, the world leaders agreed in principle that the root cause of conflicts, violence, loss of innocent lives and poverty is due to the injustices imposed on them by the judicial systems of the states. Today after 70 years of establishment of the United Nations these Injustices are given birth willfully and openly by the criminal acts committed the very same judicial officers of the courts who are appointed by the Federal Government to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens by the state’s officers of one of the most civilized countries in the world Canada who is one of the prominent members of the United Nation and is a party to Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Full details of Persecutions of Hirjis for the crimes the Hirjis did not commit and the crimes committed by the state are no less evil than the crimes committed by the judicial officers of the state against the innocent victims of the World War II named in the petition and submitted in the petition filed with the United Nations Human Rights Committee on June 30, 2018, and November 25, 2018, that can be accessed on Hirjis website: https://www.mohdhirji.com/ and in the recently filed Notice of Civil Claim that can be accessed by clicking on the this link. https://drive.google.com/open?fbclid=IwAR3jxkm8ObZBU12edbQzeTZxOeYjpGuURXqpqqPL00FAJ1vKwY-oXlN3XnM

    United Nations Human Rights Committee has made tremendous progress over the past 70 years in improving Human Rights violations by the trusted judicial officers of all Member States. Nevertheless, it is still running at an astronomical rate of over 40% solely due to unfair trials. The credibility of United Nation Human Rights organization throughout society can in a great measure be improved further by careful and well-tailored measurers by the competent Human Rights Committee in this case and other similar cases and sending a clear message to all the member states by holding the perpetrators accountable with full force of the enforcement of the covenants. The committee should also be aware and bare it in mind that these violations are not due to judicial errors but they are willfully committed by the Member State to unlawfully deny justice to the Hirjis’ and to destroy their lives for the benefit of the insurers who make billions of dollars each year by abusing the court process as demonstrated by this case. The unlawful acts of the Member State blatantly undermines the authority and efforts of the United Nations to prevent Human Rights violations globally that currently accounts for 40% of all Human Rights violations that are willfully committed by judicial officers of some of the most civilized Member states like Canada who have agreed to protect the Human Rights and have ratified the ICCPR covenants.

    It is of paramount Importance for the stability of Civil Society and world peace that the United Nations Adress these issues and taking firm actions to eliminate Human rights violations willfully committed by some of the judicial officers of the courts under the umbrella of judicial independence that accounts for 40% all Human rights violations solely due to unfair trials. see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tktW_6Pwoh0&feature=share

  13. Mohd Ali Hirji and Parin Mohd Ali Hirji Lalani
    1084 Lillooet Road,
    North Vancouver,
    British Columbia V7j 2H8.
    Canada.
    Email: moh2@shaw.ca
    Email: parin.lalani@hotmail.com
    Website: http://www.mohdhirji.com
    TEL: (604) 985-9383
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
    The Honourable David Lametti
    Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
    284 Wellington Street
    Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
    Email: mcu@justice.gc.ca
    _______________________________________________________________

    Petitions Team
    urgent-action@ohchr.org
    Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
    United Nations Office at Geneva
    1211 Geneva 10 (Switzerland)
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Dear Honourable Minister Mr. David Lametti.

    The Hirjis are humbly requesting and bringing to the Ministers attention the violations of Hirjis Human Rights and Constitutional Rights “willfully violated” by the State Courts since 2015 due to the failures of the Canadian courts to uphold the rule of law and render justice and where the judges have failed to perform their judicial function and follow the law or has acted in a manner in which the general public would believe to be wrong based on the evidence in the court registries. This is in violations of Hirjis’ Constitutional Rights and also constitutes violations of Hirjis rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its First Optional Protocol. The Court of Appeal of British Columbia and the Supreme Court of Canada has failed to address the issues that never existed at the trial or in trial records that are inadmissible as evidence in law and have failed to provide a reasoned judgement or address the falsified “findings of material facts” in reason for Judgement that unlawfully changed the course of this litigation in favor the defendants and their Insurers. Had the trial court, or the Court of Appeal of B.C or the Supreme Court of Canada had fulfilled their judicial functions and carried out their judicial duties impartially and upheld the rule of law and struck off the inadmissible evidence of the defendants as required by law and not violated the plaintiffs Charter of Rights and Freedom ss. 7, 11 (d), and s.15 as well as Hirjis human rights that are enshrined in International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its First Optional Protocol and under the covenants in Article 2(3), Article 6, Article 9, Article 14, Article 16, and Article 26 than the plaintiffs would not have suffered enormous damages amounting to tens of millions of dollars based on the evidence at the hands of the courts nor would they have been placed in this position by the breaches of the State’s courts.

    Please find the attached details of the response to the defendants’ application that is self-explanatory. Based on the rule of law the orders of the Supreme Court of Canada that are null and void and are unenforceable in law. The willful refusal of the judicial officers of Supreme Court of Canada to follow their own rulings in landmark cases such as R. v. S. (R. D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484, and Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada, 2003 SCC 45 (CanLII), [2003] SCJ No 50, [2003] 2 SCR 259. This calls into question the impartiality of the highest Court of the land and its members and raises doubt on the public’s perception of the Court’s ability to render Justice according to law.
    This issue of national importance before the Minister is one of those issues that put the integrity of entire Administration of Justice, and entire Canadian system of Justice and all the judicial officers of the State as Guardians of the Justice system on trial. It puts on trial, the ability of the judicial officers of the State courts as Guardians of the Canadian Justice system and the Court’s ability to render Justice according to law of the land and uphold the Constitution. It puts on trial the credibility of the judicial officers of the State courts and honor their oath of office and pledge to protect the constitution and uphold the rule of law and render Justice impartially according to the law in this case based on the evidence and the Rule of law of the land without fear or favor regardless of the status of the perpetrators and hold them accountable for their failures and unlawful acts that brings the integrity of entire administration Justice into disrepute and raises doubt on the public’s perception of the Court’s ability to render Justice according to the law and destroying the lives of the litigants by the most trusted judicial officers of the court.

    The Hirjis have been persecuted by the judicial officers of the Canadian Courts unlawfully and willfully from 2015 to this day and have been deprived of remedies till now for the crimes that the Hirjis did not commit. These lawless acts willfully committed by the judicial officers of the State courts to willfully “Obstruct the course Justice” and willfully violate the Hirjis Charter and human rights and illegally strip them down of all their assets and their property is no less evil then the crimes and criminal acts committed by the judicial officers of the court against the victims of the World War II that can neither be justified nor can it be defended nor can it be argued successfully by the judicial officers of the Canadian courts in any International Court of Law or in any competent Court of law in the world in view of the undisputed evidence in the court records.

    Hirjis humbly requests the Honourable Minister Mr. David Lametti not to ignore this issue of “Miscarriage of Justice” willfully imposed by the Canadian courts as ignored by the Ex-Attorney General of Canada and Minister of Justice Ms. Judy Wilson Raybould. We pray that the Minister will take into consideration the seriousness and the negative impact this can have on the Canadian civil and law-abiding citizens and the Government’s ability to govern and the legal Institution’s ability to render justice impartially and uphold the rule of the law. We request the Minister to take appropriate steps or take appropriate steps to advise the government to inquire into the failures of the Canadian courts to uphold the rule of the law and the constitution and remedy this “Miscarriage of Justice” willfully imposed by the Canadian courts on the Hirjis. We will forward you the outcome of the hearing on June 24, 2019 for your further consideration.

    Kindly acknowledge receipt of this email.

    Yours Sincerely

    Mohd Ali Hirji.

    C.c United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
    C.c The Honourable Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
    https://drive.google.com/open?id=1I7KcN5eSK_WDqbTUJuOmKadfDhRuo7HW

  14. Dear friends and followers of this litigation following are the latest development update in the litigation and the submissions of the plaintiffs. The decision of the court is expected on October 22, 2019, and it will become clear whether the court will once again over exceed its jurisdiction and try to validate the void orders of the courts that are unenforceable in law and violate the plaintiffs’ rights guaranteed under the Charter of Rights and freedom under s. 7 and s.11(d).

    following is part of the plaintiffs’ submission that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendants procured the orders of the court by committing “Fraud upon the court” aided and abated by the trial judge who assisted the defendants to “defeat the course of justice” by refusing to correct the facts in reasons for judgment and inadmissible evidence of the defendants that the trial judge knew to be fabricated false, and untrue before the order was sealed.

    The trial judges almost entire reasons for judgment is based on the evidence of two defense witnesses that neither existed nor exists in the court records.

    The trial judge Justice Neana Sharma’s decision rendered on November 6, 2015, that is based on inadmissible evidence that neither existed nor exist in the court records, that unenforceable in law and is null and void.

    The court of Appeal of British Columbia and the Supreme court of Canada have validated the void orders of the trial judge and have over exceeded their jurisdiction that is challenged by the plaintiffs who are self-represented litigants.

    The plaintiffs have issued a challenge to the defense counsels to end this litigation one way or the other and for the Honourable judge to arrive at and make an informed decision and have requested the court to address this issue of void orders impartially on October 22, 2019, based on the evidence and the rule of law.

    FALSIFIED EVIDENCE OF DEFENSE WITNESS MS. LYN CAMPBELL THAT NEVER EXISTED NOR EXISTS IN THE COURT RECORDS.

    50. On May 4, 2015, at the trial, the defense witness Ex-strata manager Ms. Lyn Campbell, Strata Manager Mr. George Alexandru, and the defense counsel Mr. Alex Eged intentionally and illegally concocted the following evidence to derail the judicial machinery and defraud the plaintiffs out of their legitimate claim for damages.

    51. On pages 42 and 43 of the court transcript, Ms. Lyn Campbell testified under oath and describes how the paper flow is handled at VCS that never existed at VCS nor exists it the court records. Ms. Lyn Campbell describes the procedures of how the paper flow is handled by the front desk clerk at the law offices of Mr. Alex Aged.

    42
    Lynlaeh Campbell (for Defendants)
    In chief by Mr. Eged

    23 Q All right. Now, I want to talk to you a little bit
    24 about Vancouver Condominium Services’ paper flow —
    25 A Okay.
    26 Q — okay? And, in particular, I’d like you to tell
    27 Her Ladyship how Vancouver Condominium Services
    28 handled paperwork that was brought to the office by
    29 an owner of one of the stratas that it was
    30 managing.
    31 A Okay. It would come in. It was always date
    32 stamped and the clerks at the front desk would
    33 always ensure that there was a — the strata plan
    34 was on there. Then it would be put in a folder to
    35 be given to the property manager, and then that
    36 correspondence was added to the agenda for the next
    37 council meeting and put on the agenda. So
    38 everything was definitely date stamped and recorded
    39 coming into the office.
    40 Q Okay. I’m going to ask you to turn to Exhibit 6 in
    41 that binder in front of you please, Ms. Campbell.
    42 Okay. Have a look at that document, ma’am. You
    43 can see it says at the bottom, “Urgent” by hand,
    44 “Attention: Ms. Campbell”?
    45 A Yes.
    46 Q Okay. And you’ve seen this before; correct?
    47 A In the binders that you gave me, yes.

    43
    Lynlaeh Campbell (for Defendants)
    In chief by Mr. Eged

    1 Q Yes. And do you have any recollection of seeing
    2 this on — on or near the date indicated on the
    3 document of October 6th, 2000?
    4 A No.
    5 Q Does it bear the stamp that you would expect to —
    6 this document to bear if that had been delivered?
    7 A No.
    8 Q Do you recall ever dealing with Mr. Hirji in
    9 respect of his desire to rent out either whole or
    10 part of his unit?
    11 A No, I don’t.
    12 Q Do you recall if this document made it into a
    13 folder that you’ve described as property manager
    14 for this condominium, and later into the minutes?
    15 A No.
    16 Q Do you recall any discussions with Mr. Hirji
    17 regarding renting to students?
    18 A No.
    19 Q Based on the look of this document and your
    20 recollection about it, could you say whether or not
    21 you received it?
    22 A I could not, no. It’s …

    52. The following evidence of the defense counsel in his Affidavit indisputably establishes the defendants’ premeditated intention to deliberately and recklessly derail the judicial machinery itself. The legal counsels engaged in counseling the defense witness in committing prohibited acts, of deceit, and fraud, with intent to obstruct, pervert and defeat the course of justice in a judicial proceeding that they knew will harm the plaintiffs and will defraud the plaintiffs out of their legitimate claim for damage, and make them homeless for the crimes they did not commit.

    53. The defendants procured the judgment against the plaintiffs by Fraud, and Fraud upon the court, by “obstructing the course of justice”. This fraud upon the court is established by the defendants’ own evidence and fabricated and indisputable evidence and facts in the defense counsel’s submissions and affidavits.

    54. Mr. Eged in his affidavit # 8 filed on November 23, 2015, confirms the following at paragraph 37:

    “I had considered an amount of $5, 000 for the plaintiffs claim for loss of rental income, that being $100 per month, for eight months a year from February 2005 to July 2010. In my view, this figure represented a reasonable reduction for not having access to a deck on a bedroom rented for $800 per month, during which time the evidence was that the plaintiffs took no steps to mitigate their loss.”

    THE PLAINTIFFS ARE ISSUING THE FOLLOWING CHALLENGE TO THE DEFENSE COUNSEL FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE THAT CAN LEAVE NO REASONABLE DOUBT IN THE MIND OF THE JUDGE TO REACH AN INFORMED DECISION ON OCTOBER 22, 2019.

    2. The plaintiffs are issuing the following challenge to the defendants to end this litigation one way or the other at the hearing on October 22, 2019. The plaintiffs are issuing this challenge to the Defense counsels to produce the proof and the evidence of the existence of evidence of single written complaint submitted by the owners that is date stamped by the front desk Clark in the court records as testified by the defense witnesses (not the telephone complaint of the owners prepared by VCS agents).

    3. The plaintiffs throughout the litigation in Supreme Court of B. C action # S070817 have claimed that the strict policy of date Stamping the owners complaints at offices of the defendants property management agent Vancouver Condominium Services (“VCS”) at the relevant time during 2001 and 2015 never existed either at VCS nor exists in a single document entered into the evidence at the trial that can substantiate the testimonies of defense witnesses Ms. Lyn Campbell and Mr. George Alexandru under oath led by the defense counsels on May 4, 2015 in supreme court of B. C. action # S070817.

    4. The plaintiffs throughout the litigation have claimed in their applications and affidavits that the trial judge’s almost entire reasons for judgment are based on false testimonies of these two defense witnesses as evidence by the court record. The defense witnesses, as well as the defense counsel, knew that their evidence and the testimonies they are submitting under oath is false and untrue and neither existed at VCS nor does it exists in the court records and constitutes “Fraud upon the Court”.

    5. These claims by the plaintiffs of false and fabricated and concocted testimonies by the defendants and the defense counsels have not been repudiated or negated once in any court hearing or in any of the defendants’ affidavits.

    6. The burden of proof shifts on the defendants to negate these extremely serious claims of concocting the evidence at the trial and counselling the defense witnesses to commit prohibited acts and submitting the false testimonies in a judicial proceedings that they knew to be false and untrue and never existed at the VCS nor does it exists in any of the court records that constitute fraud upon the court.

    In Gaebel v. Lipka, 2017 BCCA 432 the court states at para 25

    [25] The trial judge’s task was to determine whether or not the accident was caused by the driver’s negligence. In her reasons, the trial judge cites Fontaine v. British Columbia (Official Administrator), 1998 CanLII 814 (SCC), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 424, for the proposition that a plaintiff cannot succeed in establishing negligence for an accident by relying on the collision itself as proof that the defendant had breached the standard of care. With respect, that statement does not accurately capture the test established in Fontaine. The test arising from Fontaine was set out by this Court in Nason v. Nunes, 2008 BCCA 203 (CanLII):

    [8] … Instead, the Court provided a simpler formulation of the correct approach that refers only to the
    end of the trial: the trier of fact should, Major J. said, weigh all the evidence, both direct and
    circumstantial, to determine whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case. If he has, the
    defendant must “negate” that evidence, failing which the plaintiff will succeed.

    7. The defendants and the defense counsels can negate the plaintiff’s extremely serious claims by producing a single document from the court records and end this litigation on October 22, 2019 and get over a million dollars from the plaintiffs that is well over the amount they are seeking in this litigation.

    a. Produce a single document that is date stamped by the front desk Clark and strata plan entered on the document by the front desk Clark entered into the evidence and the court records that will substantiate the defense witnesses Ms. Lyn Campbell and Mr. George Alexandru testimonies under oath of existence of strict policy of date stamping the owners written complaints by the front desk Clark.

    8. The plaintiffs give the following undertaking to this court and the Honourable judge that upon production of a single document entered at the trial as evidence by the defendants that confirms at the hearing on October 22, 2019, the existence of the strict policy of date stamping the owners written complaints at VCS than:

    a) The plaintiffs will concede and the plaintiffs will hand over the keys to their unit valued at over $1 million dollars to the defendants that will more than cover the defendants’ claims of $920, 000 and the plaintiffs will end this litigation on October 22, 2019 and;

    b) The plaintiffs will sign the transfer documents to their home in front of the Honourable Judge on October 22, 2019.

    9. There can only be one reason why the defendants will not produce a single document and end this litigation that would be because there is no such evidence of the strict policy of date stamping owners written complaints that existed at VCS or exists in the court records.

    10. This evidence will unarguably prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendants have procured the judgment of the court by fraud upon the court by fabricated evidence under oath that never existed at VCS nor exists in the court records in the Supreme Court action # S070817.

    The duty is imposed on the Honourable court to follow the law impartially and under court Rule 9-5 struck off the defendants’ entire defense with prejudice that is based on fabricated false and inadmissible evidence and declare the orders of the trial judge of British Columbia rendered on November 6, 2015 void and set aside.

    AN ORDER PROCURED BY FRAUD

    “An order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court, ” Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182 F.3d 548 (C.A. 7 Ill. (1999). Void judgment issued in excess of jurisdiction: “There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction.” Joyce v. U.S. 474 2D 2). “Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed but rather, should dismiss the action.” Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026 See Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 389. “Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proven to exist.” See also Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215., “There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction.” See also Rosemond V. Lambert, 469 F2d 416., The burden shifts to the courts to prove jurisdiction.

    11. This evidence on October 22, 2019 will indisputably establish the Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, that no other logical explanation can be arrived at and will establish the fact that the trial judge’s orders are based on the evidence of defense witness that the trial judge knew with substantial certainty to be false and untrue and inadmissible as evidence and were brought to the attention of the trial judge before the order was sealed.

    The decision of the court is expected on October 22, 2019, that will be published here. You can excess to full submission on this link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1A7aPhGF28CfoZ13rx0ZfX2VEtbMaDXTN

    DRIVE.GOOGLE.COM
    Written Submission for October 22, 2019.pdf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.